Describe the differences in your articles designs and methods.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a nursing case study and need support to help me learn.For this assignment you will use the Quantitative and the Qualitative article that you submitted for week 4 assignment that were related to your week 2 picot question.
Only articles you uploaded and used in week 4 (Quantitative or Qualitative) are to be submitted. Articles must be current (within the last 5 years). All articles must be related to the field of nursing and related to the topic list from week 2.
Write a summary (one to two pages)
In the summary identify differences in article designs and research methods. Describe the differences in your articles designs and methods. Carefully review the rubric before you submit. This summary is using your own words to examine the differences specifically between the articles.
Use current APA style for your summary paper and to cite your sources.
Submit the Articles and the summary
RubricNURS_350_OL – NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal ChecklistsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo substantive research articles
(one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies.10 to >8.9 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsTwo quality, substantive articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are suitable original research studies.8.9 to >7.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsTwo articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are mostly substantive, but at least one is not a suitable original research study, or is not sufficiently substantive.7.5 to >5.9 ptsBelow ExpectationsOne article is selected and identified as qualitative or quantitative research, or it is not a suitable original research study.5.9 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsArticles are not original research; one qualitative and one quantitative article are not identified.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the research problem and purpose of each research article40 to >35.6 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsThe research problem and the purpose for each article are expertly examined.35.6 to >30.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsThe research problem and the purpose for each article are adequately examined with minor omissions or errors.30 to >23.6 ptsBelow ExpectationsThe research problem and the purpose for each article are vague, absent or not identified, and contain major omissions or errors.23.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe research problem and its purpose are not identified for any of the articles.40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the research methods for each research article30 to >26.7 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsAn extensive description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is clearly presented for each article.26.7 to >22.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsAn adequate description of the, variables, the sample, and the research methods is presented for most articles with minor omissions or errors.22.5 to >17.7 ptsBelow ExpectationsAn unsatisfactory description of the variables, sample, and the research methods is presented for both articles with major omissions or errors.17.7 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsA description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is not presented for any of the articles.30 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of the findings/conclusions/themes for each research article40 to >35.6 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsAn expertly examined investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is skillfully presented for each article.35.6 to >30.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsAn adequate investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both is satisfactorily presented with minor omissions or errors.30 to >23.6 ptsBelow ExpectationsAn unsatisfactory investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is provided with major omissions or errors, or only one of the articles is investigated and presented satisfactorily.23.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsA description of the findings, themes, and conclusions, is not presented for either article.40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the similarities and differences among the research articles60 to >53.4 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsThe description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is clear and thorough.53.4 to >45.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsThe description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is adequate with minor omissions or errors.45 to >35.4 ptsBelow ExpectationsThe description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is inadequate with major omissions or errors.35.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is not provided.60 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA10 to >8.9 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsUses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources with only 1–2 errors. Sources are expertly cited and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources. Meets all formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.8.9 to >7.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsUses APA Style with minor citation violations with 3–4 errors. Sources are somewhat relevant, but may be limited in scholarly nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.7.5 to >5.9 ptsBelow ExpectationsReflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 errors. Sources are not cited, or there are many errors. Sources are not scholarly in nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.5.9 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not use APA Style, or there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics10 to >8.9 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsThe writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and information; and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors.8.9 to >7.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsThe writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, includes sufficient details, and is well organized, but it may contain a few errors. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with not many errors.7.5 to >5.9 ptsBelow ExpectationsThe writing lacks clarity or conciseness, contains numerous errors, and lacks organization. Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper5.9 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; and is poorly organized. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.10 ptsTotal Points: 200
Requirements: 2-3 pages

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more