How do these strategies affect their readers?

Learning Goal: I’m working on a literature project and need a sample draft to help me learn.Below is the prompt and directions for a essay I am required to write. I’ve attached “The New Jim Crow” and The world and me” below in order to complete the assignment.During this project, we learned that a rhetorical analysis examines aspects of the rhetorical situation (writer, audience, purpose, context) and explains how the appeals, tone, and other rhetorical characteristics work together to create a certain effect. Remember that, while your analysis may touch on the ideas (content or topics) of a text, a rhetorical analysis essay’s main goal is to construct and develop an interesting argument that illuminates the effects of writers’ rhetorical choices: How does a writer’s tone affect the character of their argument? How do their choices regarding ethos, pathos, and logos, affect the targeted audience? In constructing a rhetorical analysis, the writer (that’s you!) identifies and critically analyzes the rhetorical strategies the author uses in order to comment on the effectiveness of the text.Having learned about the rhetorical situation and rhetorical concepts like ethos, pathos, and logos, your job in this assignment is to compare and contrast the methods of persuasion used by M. Alexander with those used by Ta-Nehisi Coates in the assigned excerpts from The New Jim Crow and Between the World and Me. (Length Requirement: 1,200-1,500 words.) To review this genre’s conventions, review the UNC Writing Center’s page on compare/contrast essays (Links to an external site.), which is fantastic as usual and offers methods for addressing one of the challenges of this assignment: illuminating something new for your readers. As we have learned, merely pointing out examples of ethos, pathos, or logos in the texts is only a jumping-off point; you must develop these discussions to explain the significance of your observations, or you will leave your reader wondering why they are slogging through the essay. Remember that you should be advancing a thesis, and your thesis should incorporate some of the vocabulary and themes we read in Elizabeth Browning’s chapter on rhetoric (linked below for review). In sum, the challenge of this assignment (aside from the criteria noted in our Project 2 Rubric) is to demonstrate significance in your thesis and achieve analytical depth in your analysis.Start by providing context with a brief discussion of the subject/topic that the two genres are focusing on. Include the title of each piece, the genre type, and the author (or authors) of each in the introduction; and identify the thesis/purpose, either implied or stated, in each genre. However, your thesis should compare/contrast two texts and should ideally articulate an interesting revelation about how the rhetoric is working, one that a casual reader may not have previously noticed. Remember that you are comparing and contrasting two texts, so your paper will be different from the following example, but this instructive, well annotated example (Links to an external site.) will help you review the useful rhetorical analysis techniques we have learned during this project. (Links to an external site.)If you would like suggestions in terms of process, I think the following general sequence works well for this paper:Step 1: Do some close readings of these two excerpts in order to understand the content of each author’s arguments, as well as how they are constructed. Be sure to annotate. After you have a solid grasp on the authors’ main arguments, narrow your focus to two or three passages, two or three main arguments that you believe you understand well. These will be the passages you use to develop and support your thesis. Remember that you are not writing an essay that agrees or disagrees with the authors’ arguments. That sort of writing has its place, but in this project, you are writing a much more nuanced piece: You are using a rhetorical analysis to illuminate something for your reader about how the arguments function.Step 2: Carefully reread Elizabeth Browning’s wonderful chapter on Rhetorical Analysis (Links to an external site.). What aspects of Browning’s chapter seem most relevant to you as you analyze the passages you’ve decided to focus on? Use Browning’s chapter and your knowledge of rhetoric to discuss which strategies of persuasion Alexander and Coates employ in their work. (Be sure to employ the vocabulary you’ve acquired throughout this project.) How do these strategies affect their readers? In what ways are they similar? Different? Do some free-writing, and develop close reading analyses of your chosen passages. It may help to review the close reading analysis techniques we learned during Project 1.Step 3: Examine your free-writing and other notes, and begin to organize your thoughts. Create a simple outline that features (at least) your thesis statement followed by a list of your topic sentences arranged in a logical manner. Failing to create at least a very basic outline before you start drafting is similar to trying to build a house without a blueprint. It’s probably gonna look pretty bad, and it will likely fall apart. Now, start writing.
Requirements: 1200-1500 words   |   .doc file

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more