Proving lack of consent in rape cases has two components.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a criminal justice multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.Chapter 10What is the attendant circumstance element of rape and what kind of defense is possible for the accused?
Proving lack of consent in rape cases has two components. What are they? Give some examples of conditions or circumstances which might affect the first component. List and describe the situations that might affect the second component.
Describe the difference between early common law corroborative evidence needed to meet the burden of proof for the elements of rape and what is required in the modern-day. Does the difference make it easy to achieve a conviction in modern-day prosecutions?
What is meant by “rape shield laws”? What was the purpose of rape shield laws? What type of evidence do rape shield laws prohibit? Provide examples.
Chapter 11What jurisdictions criminalize receiving stolen property, what is the purpose of that offense, and who is often targeted with that offense?
What is the criminal act element required for receiving stolen property? Does the criminal act require the defendant to be in control of the property? What kind of possession is being described when someone has control of something but doesn’t actually possess it?
What are the two parts of the criminal intent element required for receiving stolen property? Describe each part in detail.
What are the attendant circumstances that must be proved by the prosecution for receiving stolen property?
Requirements: 300-400 words   |   .doc file