Was the piece convincing? Why or why not, specifically? is it well-researched?

Learning Goal: I’m working on a communications writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.I am sure by now you have heard the NCAA note how well they are doing academically and Student-Athletes are graduating at a high rate etc……Please read the attached document and Write a 2-3 page double-spaced reaction paper to the Drake group “Why the NCAA Academic Progress Rate (APR) and the Graduation Success Rate (GSR) should be Abandoned and Replaced with More Effective Academic Metrics”.DUE TONIGHT 11:59pmAnalysis/EvaluationWhat are the strengths and weaknesses of the piece?Goal: Show that you understand what the author does well and what he or she does not do so well.Why, not, what, what if, what for, where, who, how, when . .
Specific questions you might take up include:
Was the piece convincing? Why or why not, specifically? is it well-researched?
Did the author overlook or leave out anything important? What? Did the author overemphasize or overprivilege anything? What?
Is the author one-sided (even if he or she takes your side), or does the author presented a balanced view?
Your ReactionsHow do you react to the piece on a personal level? How does the piece relate to your experience?Share your own impressionsQuestions you might consider answering:
Did the piece bother or annoy you? Why or why not?
What would you ask, or tell, the author of the piece if you could?
What did you realize as a result of reading the piece?
What questions does the piece raise for you — about the material, about other things?
Requirements: 2-3 page double space   |   .doc file