What compromises might you have to make in terms of the interactive features that wouldn’t now be viable?

Learning Goal: I’m working on a r question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.Use the graph in step 4 of https://www.kaggle.com/mksaad/exercise-final-proje… which is the selected project to answer the following question:If the selected project was a static work, what ideas do you have for potentially making it usefully interactive? How might you approach the design if it had to work on both mobile/tablet and desktop?
If the selected project was an interactive work, what ideas do you have for potentially deploying the same project as a static work? What compromises might you have to make in terms of the interactive features that wouldn’t now be viable?
What about the various annotations that could be used? Thoroughly explain all of the annotations, color, composition, and other various components to the visualization.
What other data considerations should be considered and why?
Update the graphic using updated data, in R and explain the differences.
Be sure to show the graphic (before and after updates), R code used, and then answer the questions fully above. The paper should be at least three pages in length and contain at least two-peer reviewed sources.
Requirements: 3 pages   |   .doc file